Estate of Barrett

Good Law
5 Coffey 376
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoJune 24, 1899No. 21,229California6,206 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

AUTHORITY OF ONE OF SEVERAL EXECUTORS OR ADMINISTRATORS.

Powers in General.

At Common Law.—Where two or more executors or administrators are appointed, the common law esteems them as one person representing the decedent. Hence each has authority to perform any act, in the ordinary course of administration, that all can do; the acts of one are deemed the acts of all, and bind all and the estate accordingly, inasmuch as corepresentatives have a joint and entire authority over the assets of their decedent. Each has full authority in matters of administrative detail: Willis v. Farley, 24 Cal. 490 ; Wilkerson v. Wootten, 28 Ga. 568 ; Scruggs v. Gibson, 40 Ga. 511 ; Alerding v. Allison, 170 Ind. 252 , 127 Am. St. Rep. 363 , 83 N. E. 1006 ; Clark’s Exrs. v. Farrar, 3 Mart. (O. S.) 247 ; Bodley v. McKinney, 9 Smedes & M. (17 Miss.) 339; Bank of Port Gibson v. Baugh, 9 Smedes & M. (17 Miss.) 290; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Sturges, 33 N. J. Eq. 328; Murray v. Blatchford, 1 Wend. 583 , 19 Am. Dec. 537 ; In re Bradley, 25 Misc. Rep. 261 , 54 N. Y. Supp. 555 ; Arkenburgh v. Arkenburgh, 27 Misc. Rep. 760 , 59 N. Y. Supp. 612 ; Chapman v. City Council of Charleston, 30 S. C. 549, 9 S. E. 591 , 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.