Estate of Tittel

Good Law
1 Myrick 12
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoJuly 1, 1872No. 4681California295 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Deceased was about seventy-five years of age at the date *13 of the proposed will. She was offended with her sons, Frederick, Charles, August and William, for the opposition made by them to her claims in the administration and distribution of the estate of her husband, their father, who died intestate in 1864, leaving valuable property on Kearny street. By this will she gives all her property to her sons Ernst and Conrad, her daughter Mrs. Himmelman, and her granddaughters Mrs. Hamburg and Mrs. Boehme; and she disinherits her four sons first above named, for the reasons, expressed in the will, that they had been undutiful to her, and had caused her expensive litigation, and that they were already sufficiently provided for. . William was in Mexico during the litigation referred to, but was represented by his brother Frederick in opposition to his mother. Upon his return the matter had been adjusted;' and William ratified, as was contended on the trial, all that his brother Fred, had done, thereby making himself as much a party to that proceeding as if he had been personally present. August and William are both dead, but their minor children were represented at the trial by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.