Estate of Marvin

Good Law
1 Myrick 163
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoApril 11, 1876No. 4138California1,092 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

While the executor of the will of testator was in office, he employed Messrs. Parker & Boche, attorneys, to render professional services in and about the management of the estate, and services were rendered. Subsequently, the executor resigned, and an administrator has been appointed. The attorneys now apply for an order that the administrator pay their fees. It is objected by the administrator, that the Court has no power to make the order; that the attorneys must look to the former executor, and that the Court has only the power to allow the amount in the account of the executor, after payment by him.

I do not concur in this view. The administration of an estate is an entirety, and when services of any kind are rendered in and about the proper business of the estate, .the person rendering services may have his pay from the administrator in office. The Court has power to compel the administrator to pay; otherwise the person rendering services may be quite at the mercy of the administrator employing him, or be compelled to sue him, and if he be insolvent, lose the amount due, while the estate would enjoy the results.

The Court will hear proofs as to the services rendered and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.