Estate of Yee Yun
Opinion
lead Opinion
The deceased left a paper purporting to be a will, which all parties hereto admit to have been duly executed, and the same is entitled to be admitted to probate.
*182 The controversy is as to who shall administer. No person is named in the will as executor. Testator had a wife in China, a brother living in Sacramento, and a nephew now here, who is sole legatee and devisee.
The brother requests that letters issue to Yee Bu Ki, (a Chinaman,) and the Public Administrator contests his application, and petitions for letters of administration to himself.
The attorney for Yee Bu Ki makes the point that as deceased left a will, although silent as to the executor, the Public Administrator has no right to administer; that his right is confined exclusively to cases of intestacy. It is a sufficient reply to that, to say, that the right of a brother to administer is provided for in the same section of the Code referring to the Public Administrator; and if the latter has no right to administer in ease of a will, neither- has the brother, and the selection of an administrator would be left with the Court.
The Public Administrator claims that the brother would have no right to administer, and…