Estate of Haskell

Good Law
1 Myrick 204
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoOctober 15, 1878No. 8382California336 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Heretofore, Haskell, as husband of deceased, applied for letters of administration, which were granted. After four months, E. D. Scofield petitioned for partial distribution, claiming the whole estate as sole heir at law, alleging himself to be the only child of- deceased by a former marriage, and that the marriage with Haskell was void. Haskell answered the petition, alleging the grant of letters to him, and claims that all parties are now estopped from questioning his relationship; that the order of this Court granting letters to him is an adjudication for all purposes that he was the husband of deceased. Yolena E. Harrigan demurred to the answer, and argument was had on the demurrer.

The object of the petition for and the grant of letters was to have an adjudication that the deceased had died, and that she left estate subject to administration *205 in this Court. The existence and allegation of these facts, the requisite notice being given, gave the Court jurisdiction. The question as to who should be the administrator is quite another matter. The administrator is but an officer of the Court. The object of alleging that petitioner-was the husband, was for the purpose of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.