Estate of Wardell

Good Law
1 Myrick 224
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoJanuary 15, 1879No. 6959California317 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ada Wardell died testate, leaving her surviving a husband, two children by a former husband, and the petitioner, Cornelia McCausland, her illegitimate child. The will bequeaths and devises all the property to her husband and the two children by the former husband; no reference is made in the will to the petitioner, Cornelia McCausland.

The question for consideration is, whether the illegitimate child takes a share in the estate.

Sec. 1307, provides that when any testator omits to provide in his will for any of his children, unless it appears that such omission was intentional, such child must have the same share in the estate as if the deceased had died intestate.

It is argued, for the devisees, that the words “ children ” and “ child ” in this section are to be construed so as to include those only who were known to the common law as being within the meaning of the words; and as at common law an illegitimate child did not inherit from either parent, and was the child of nobody, such child is not within the section referred to.

It is not necessary to go to the common law for a rule by which to construe this section. Sec. 1387 of the same Code, *225 provides that “every…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.