United States v. Jose Rodriguez-Alvarez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 201211-10009California282 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10009

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00883-SRB-1

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JOSE MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-

ALVAREZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Alvarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

30-month sentence imposed for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Alvarez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along

with a motion to withdraw as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.