Ruby Garibaldi v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 202219-70507California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBY ESTELLA GARIBALDI, AKA Ruby No. 19-70507 Estella Ortega Garibaldi, Agency No. A095-771-559 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,** District Judge.

Ruby Garibaldi (“Garibaldi” or “Petitioner”), a native of Mexico who was

brought to the United States as an infant, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering her removal to Mexico. Garibaldi’s petition is

based upon her contention that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.