Harold Pick v. James Kay, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 202220-55804California958 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD PICK, an individual; et al., No. 20-55804
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07137-DMG-FFM v.
JAMES A. KAY, Jr., an individual; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 11, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Appellants Harold Pick, Jay Francis, and Wireless US, LC appeal from the
district court’s dismissal of their action against appellees James Kay and Lucky’s
Two-Way Radios, Inc. (Kay appellees) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Peter
Carlson (Motorola appellees) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of 5
1. The district court did not err in…