Harold Pick v. James Kay, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 202220-55804California958 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAROLD PICK, an individual; et al., No. 20-55804

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07137-DMG-FFM v.

JAMES A. KAY, Jr., an individual; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 11, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Harold Pick, Jay Francis, and Wireless US, LC appeal from the

district court’s dismissal of their action against appellees James Kay and Lucky’s

Two-Way Radios, Inc. (Kay appellees) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Peter

Carlson (Motorola appellees) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of 5

1. The district court did not err in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.