Universe

Filed 1/24/22 Universe v. Harel CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

UNIVERSE, INC., B303091

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC107063) v.

ASHER HAREL,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Huey P. Cotton, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Richard P. Towne for Appellant. Krishel Law Firm and Daniel L. Krishel for Respondent.

__________________________ This appeal presents a rather unspectacular question: Is there a legal difference between the execution of an assignment and its effect on the rights of third parties. The answer is an unsurprising, “Plenty,” and that drives the resolution of the appeal. Plaintiff Universe, Inc.…