Jeffrey Almada v. Krieger Law Firm, A.P.C.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 202221-55275California1,180 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY A. ALMADA, on behalf of No. 21-55275 himself and all other similarly situated class members, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02109-TWR-MDD Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

KRIEGER LAW FIRM, A.P.C.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY, III, *** District Judge.

Jeffrey Almada appeals the district court’s order granting the Kriger Law

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen Joseph Murphy, III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.