Felipe Estevez-Juarez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 202219-71838California436 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE DANIEL ESTEVEZ-JUAREZ, No. 19-71838

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-312-883

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Felipe Daniel Estevez-Juarez, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Bonilla v. Lynch,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). We review de novo claims of due process

violations in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.