Pappas

Pappas v. State Coastal Conservancy

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2022B304347MCalifornia6,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 1/25/22 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

CAROLYN PAPPAS et al., 2d Civil No. B304347 (Super. Ct. No. 1417388) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Santa Barbara County)

v. ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

STATE COASTAL REHEARING (NO CHANGE

CONSERVANCY et al., IN JUDGMENT)

Defendants and Respondents,

GAVIOTA COASTAL TRAIL

ALLIANCE,

Intervener and Appellant.

THE COURT:

The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on December 28, 2021, is modified as follows: 1. On page 16, first full paragraph, the fifth sentence beginning with “Alternatively, Hollister characterized” is deleted and replaced with the following: Alternatively, Hollister contended that whatever rights the OTD conveyed did not fit within the statute’s express definition of “‘state land,’” i.e., “a fee, title, easement, deed restriction, or other interest in land.” (§ 30609.5, subd. (e).) 2. On page 17, second full paragraph, the third sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.