In re G.D. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2022C093850California4,694 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/25/22 In re G.D. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re G.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C093850 Law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES (Super. Ct. No. AGENCY, STK-JV-DP-2019-0000225)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.E. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

J.E., the biological father (father), and N.A., the biological mother (mother), of the infant minor G.D. (minor), appeal from orders terminating their parental rights and freeing the minor for adoption. Specifically, father and mother assert that the trial court erred in failing to conduct a mandatory paternity inquiry as provided by Welfare and Institutions Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.