Duff

Duff v. Jaguar Land Rover North America CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2022D077537California6,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/25/22 Duff v. Jaguar Land Rover North America CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KEN DUFF, D077537

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2016- 00003200-CU-BC-CTL)

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH

AMERICA, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Katherine A. Bacal, Judge. Affirmed. Michael E. Lindsey for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lehrman, Villegas, Chinery & Douglas, Kate S. Lehrman, Jacqueline A. Bruce-Chinery and Robert A. Philipson for Defendant and Respondent. Ken Duff leased a new vehicle. After about 13 months into a three-year term, the vehicle began to experience mechanical and cosmetic issues. Because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.