United States v. Brandon Ball
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202221-10120California1,144 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10120
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-01420-SPL-2 v.
BRANDON TREVOR BALL, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Brandon Ball appeals the denial of his compassionate release motion. A court
may reduce a sentence, after considering the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a), if it finds that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a reduction.
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Ball argues the court misapplied this standard. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…