Usfs

Unite the Parks v. Usfs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202221-16238California1,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITE THE PARKS; SEQUOIA No. 21-16238

FORESTKEEPER; EARTH ISLAND

INSTITUTE, D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00518-DAD-HBK Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 12, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Unite the Parks, et al., appeal from the district court’s

order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction against thirty-one logging

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. projects proposed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.