Norman Pickett, Jr. v. E. Hawkins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202221-55247California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr., No. 21-55247

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-08755-GW-E

v.

MEMORANDUM*

E. HAWKINS, Licensed Clinician Social

Worker, individual; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Norman Charles Pickett, Jr., appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

retaliation, deliberate indifference, and due process claims. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.