Martin Ventress v. David Kilgore
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202221-55433California296 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTIN VENTRESS, No. 21-55433
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02192-MWF-
MRW
v.
DIRECTOR DAVID KILGORE, California MEMORANDUM* Department of Child Support Services; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Martin Ventress appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action alleging federal and state law claims concerning child support payments.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district
court’s sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral…