Martin Ventress v. David Kilgore

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202221-55433California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN VENTRESS, No. 21-55433

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02192-MWF-

MRW

v.

DIRECTOR DAVID KILGORE, California MEMORANDUM* Department of Child Support Services; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Martin Ventress appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims concerning child support payments.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district

court’s sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.