Lay Trece Williams v. Circle K Stores Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202220-16949California371 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LAY TRECE V. WILLIAMS, No. 20-16949
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01952-SMB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CIRCLE K STORES INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Lay Trece V. Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in her Title VII employment action alleging discrimination and
retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.
Weil v. Citizens Telecom Servs. Co., LLC, 922 F.3d 993, 1001 (9th Cir. 2019). We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.