Lay Trece Williams v. Circle K Stores Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 202220-16949California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAY TRECE V. WILLIAMS, No. 20-16949

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01952-SMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CIRCLE K STORES INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Lay Trece V. Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her Title VII employment action alleging discrimination and

retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Weil v. Citizens Telecom Servs. Co., LLC, 922 F.3d 993, 1001 (9th Cir. 2019). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

In her opening brief, Williams fails to address the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.