Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ARTEM KOSHKALDA, No. 20-60027

Debtor, BAP No. 19-1235

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

ARTEM KOSHKALDA,

Appellant,

v.

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; EPSON

AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Brand, Taylor, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Artem Koshkalda appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order in

Seiko Epson Corporation’s (“Epson”) adversary proceeding seeking to prevent

Koshkalda from discharging a judgment Epson received against him. We…