People v. Mendoza CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2022H048031California1,864 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

I. BACKGROUND

The underlying facts are not relevant to this appeal. Accordingly, we do not summarize them here. In 2001, a jury convicted defendant of carjacking (§ 215; count 1), unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 2), and misdemeanor battery (§ 242; count 4). Defendant admitted allegations that he had suffered a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)), had served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subds. (a) and (b)), and had been out of custody on bail at the time he committed counts 1 and 2. The trial court sentenced defendant to 23 years in state prison. That term included a consecutive five-year enhancement under section 667, subdivision (a)(1) for the prior serious felony conviction. In early 2020, the Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) sent a letter to the trial court recommending that, pursuant to section 1170, subdivision (d), defendant’s sentence be recalled and that he be resentenced. The letter explained that the recommendation “provide[d] the court with authority to resentence” defendant; that section 1170,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.