William Myers, Jr. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202220-16592California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JAN 26 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM J. MYERS, Jr., AKA William J. No. 20-16592 Myers, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05243-MTL Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR

INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

William J. Myers, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting

defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and denying

Myers’s post-judgment motion for relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Myers’s request for oral argument (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.