William Myers, Jr. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JAN 26 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM J. MYERS, Jr., AKA William J. No. 20-16592 Myers, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05243-MTL Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR
INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
William J. Myers, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting
defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and denying
Myers’s post-judgment motion for relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Myers’s request for oral argument (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied. § 1291. We…