United States v. Robert Sprenkle
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10146
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00146-AWI-BAM-1 v.
ROBERT ARON SPRENKLE, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Robert Aron Sprenkle appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Sprenkle’s request for oral argument is denied. 1 The order to show cause issued on November 30, 2021, is discharged. As an…