United States v. Robert Sprenkle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202221-10146California375 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10146

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00146-AWI-BAM-1 v.

ROBERT ARON SPRENKLE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Robert Aron Sprenkle appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Sprenkle’s request for oral argument is denied. 1 The order to show cause issued on November 30, 2021, is discharged. As an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.