Scott Wilford v. National Education Association

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202219-55712California584 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JAN 26 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCOTT WILFORD; et al., No. 19-55712

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:18-cv-01169-JLS-DFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NATIONAL EDUCATION

ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED

STATES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE

OF CALIFORNIA,

Intervenor-Defendant- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellants’ request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Scott Wilford, Bonnie Hayhurst, Rebecca Friedrichs, Michael Monge,

Harlan Elrich, Jelena Figueroa, and Gene Gray appeal from the district court’s

judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.