Ronald Payne v. Diana Marsteiner
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RONALD PAYNE, No. 21-55296
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-10066-JWH-KK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DIANA MARSTEINER, Judge, Individual and official capacity; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Ronald Payne appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging equal protection and due process violations
stemming from workers’ compensation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Contrary to Payne’s contentions, the magistrate…