Richard Green v. Dinh Hoang Phuong

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD LEE GREEN, No. 21-35146

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-mc-00011-TMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DINH HOANG PHUONG,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Richard Lee Green appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action seeking to enforce an arbitration award under 9 U.S.C. § 201.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

abstention determination under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). ReadyLink

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Healthcare, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 754 F.3d…