Randy Moore v. Unknown Party

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY MICHAEL KI’HEEM MOORE, No. 21-15156

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01418-JAT-CDB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNKNOWN PARTY, Inmate Legal Support Specialist S/N B1300; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Pretrial detainee Randy Michael Ki’Heem Moore appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an

access-to-courts claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 447 (9th Cir.…