Randy Moore v. State of Arizona
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RANDY MICHAEL KI’HEEM MOORE, No. 21-15618
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01967-SMB-CDB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF ARIZONA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Pretrial detainee Randy Michael Ki’Heem Moore appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations
of his constitutional rights during his ongoing state criminal case. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443,…