Randy Moore v. State of Arizona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202221-15618California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY MICHAEL KI’HEEM MOORE, No. 21-15618

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01967-SMB-CDB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF ARIZONA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Pretrial detainee Randy Michael Ki’Heem Moore appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations

of his constitutional rights during his ongoing state criminal case. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.