Pablo Holguin v. R. Wicks
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202219-17163California267 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PABLO HERNANDEZ HOLGUIN, No. 19-17163
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00346-DAD-BAM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
R. WICKS, Correctional Lieutenant,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Pablo Hernandez Holguin appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he
was denied due process during a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s decision on cross-
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motions for summary…