Pablo Holguin v. R. Wicks

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202219-17163California267 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO HERNANDEZ HOLGUIN, No. 19-17163

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00346-DAD-BAM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

R. WICKS, Correctional Lieutenant,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Pablo Hernandez Holguin appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he

was denied due process during a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s decision on cross-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motions for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.