Lvmpd

Michael Clark v. Lvmpd

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202221-15128California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL E. CLARK, No. 21-15128

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02178-JAD-NJK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael E. Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a municipal policy or custom of conducting

false arrests. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Clark fails to address the district court’s summary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment, and he has therefore waived…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.