Jose Marmol Bernabe v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202219-72156California235 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ABRAHAM MARMOL BERNABE, No. 19-72156

Petitioner, Agency No. A029-217-336

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Judge

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Abraham Marmol Bernabe, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming an asylum officer’s

negative credible fear determination issued in expedited removal proceedings. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We generally lack jurisdiction to review expedited removal proceedings,

including the determination that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.