Brendan Kuklok v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202221-15105California598 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRENDAN KUKLOK, No. 21-15105
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-02958-DMR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted January 19, 2022***
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Brendan Kuklok appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), Privacy
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Act (“PA”), and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo.…