Brendan Kuklok v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 202221-15105California598 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENDAN KUKLOK, No. 21-15105

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-02958-DMR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 19, 2022***

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Brendan Kuklok appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), Privacy

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Act (“PA”), and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.