Kiupelian

Kiupelian v. Gemayel CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2022B309826California4,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Facts

In January or March of 2015, Ara and Vardan Kiupelian (plaintiffs) bought stock in a company called Greenkraft, Inc. (Greenkraft) at a price of $.02 to $.28 per share. They bought $71,000’s worth. Plaintiffs bought this stock based on the representations of George Gemayel (Gemayel), who was Greenkraft’s founder, president, CEO, and sole director. Specifically, Gemayel told them that (1) Greenkraft was a “manufacturer of alternative fuel engine products,” (2) Greenkraft was a “viable, growing business,” (3) there was “lots of demand” for Greenkraft’s products, (4) “lots of people” had already invested in Greenkraft, and (5) Greenkraft’s stock would increase in value to $13 to $15

2 per share (that is, that the stock’s value would increase by somewhere between 4,642 and 75,000 percent). Gemayel’s representations to plaintiffs were not true: Greenkraft was never a “viable, growing business”; there was not “lots of demand” for its products; it had only 94 shareholders, which in plaintiffs’ view is not “lots of people”; and its stock price never exceeded $1 to $3 per share (and between 2016 and 2018, never exceeded $.50 per share).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.