Suzanne Conry v. Sharon Hamilton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-60053California416 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SHARON HAMILTON, No. 20-60053

Debtor, BAP No. 20-1037

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

SUZANNE CONRY,

Appellant,

v.

SHARON HAMILTON; et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Spraker, Taylor, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Suzanne Conry appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motions for

reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de

novo BAP decisions and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied

to the bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.