Suzanne Conry v. Sharon Hamilton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-60053California416 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: SHARON HAMILTON, No. 20-60053
Debtor, BAP No. 20-1037
------------------------------
MEMORANDUM*
SUZANNE CONRY,
Appellant,
v.
SHARON HAMILTON; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Spraker, Taylor, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Suzanne Conry appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motions for
reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de
novo BAP decisions and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied
to the bankruptcy…