Joseph Anderson v. James Dzurenda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202221-16549California321 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH M. ANDERSON, No. 21-16549

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00426-MMD-

CLB

v.

JAMES DZURENDA; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Joseph M. Anderson, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his motion for injunctive relief in his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging violations of his First Amendment right to free exercise of

his religious beliefs. We have jurisdiction to determine our own jurisdiction.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Havensight Capital LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.