J. Carlson v. Paul Penzone
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-17368California444 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
J.W. CARLSON, No. 20-17368
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-04111-SPL-JZB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Arizona state prisoner J.W. Carlson appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional
violations while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.