Hung Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202221-15698California424 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUNG M. NGUYEN, No. 21-15698

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00239-TLN-KJN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

OFFICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Hung M. Nguyen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of his

prosecution for trespassing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.