Hung Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202221-15698California424 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUNG M. NGUYEN, No. 21-15698
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00239-TLN-KJN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OFFICE,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Hung M. Nguyen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of his
prosecution for trespassing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668…