Hung Nguyen v. Cache Creek Casino Resort
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202221-15351California315 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUNG M. NGUYEN, No. 21-15351
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01748-TLN-KJN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CACHE CREEK CASINO RESORT,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Hung M. Nguyen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cook v. AVI Casino Enters., Inc.,
548 F.3d 718, 722 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed Nguyen’s action because Nguyen
failed…