Debra Milke v. City of Phoenix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-17210California1,570 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JAN 27 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEBRA JEAN MILKE, No. 20-17210
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00462-ROS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF PHOENIX; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY,
Maricopa County Attorney - in his official capacity; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 10, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Debra Milke brought various claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court found, she and her lawyers knowingly and willfully obstructed discovery and
destroyed an extraordinary amount of physical evidence and some electronic
evidence. The district court did not clearly err in so finding. See Merchant v.
Corizon Health, Inc., 993 F.3d 733, 739 (9th Cir. 2021). The…