Damian Dudley v. Philip MacLaren

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-17495California412 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAMIAN L. DUDLEY, No. 20-17495

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01237-DGC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PHILIP MACLAREN, named as Chaplain Maclaren,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Damian L. Dudley appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious

Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) arising from his inability

to observe Ramadan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo. Shakur v. Schriro, 514…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.