Brian Erskine v. Forrest Fenn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202221-15373California533 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JAN 27 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN ERSKINE, No. 21-15373

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08123-JJT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FORREST FENN; ZOE FENN OLD, in her capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Forrest Burke Fenn,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Brian Erskine appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for lack of personal jurisdiction his diversity action alleging breach of contract and

denying his request to transfer the action to the District of New Mexico under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1631. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.