Brian Erskine v. Forrest Fenn
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JAN 27 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRIAN ERSKINE, No. 21-15373
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08123-JJT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FORREST FENN; ZOE FENN OLD, in her capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Forrest Burke Fenn,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Brian Erskine appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
for lack of personal jurisdiction his diversity action alleging breach of contract and
denying his request to transfer the action to the District of New Mexico under 28
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1631. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…