Batdorj Erdenebat v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-73288California489 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BATDORJ ERDENEBAT; No. 20-73288

BAYARTSETSEG TSOGTBAYAR;

NAMULAN BATDORJ, Agency Nos. A216-524-932

A216-524-933

Petitioners, A216-524-934

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, NGUYEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Batdorj Erdenebat, his wife Bayartsetseg Tsogtbayar, and their daughter

Namulan Batdorj, natives and citizens of Mongolia, petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge’s decision denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.