Jaffe

Adam Blomdahl v. Jaffe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202220-17321California699 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADAM PAUL BLOMDAHL, No. 20-17321

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00227-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAFFE, Dr. (CHS) - County Health Services Doctor at Psychiatric Unit 3 (MCSO); et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Adam Paul Blomdahl appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

violations while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.