People v. Molina CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
A jury found defendant and appellant Mario Adam Molina guilty of stalking in
violation of a restraining order (Pen. Code,1 § 646.9, subd. (b), count 1) and found true the
allegation that he was subject to a temporary restraining order. The jury also found him
guilty of violating a protective order. (§ 273.6, subd. (a), count 2.) A trial court sentenced
defendant to the upper term of four years on count 1, plus a concurrent term of one year on
count 2.
On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to show he stalked
the victim while a restraining order was in effect; (2) the concurrent term on count 2 must be
stayed pursuant to section 654; and (3) the matter should be remanded for resentencing
because the court mistakenly believed it did not have the discretion to grant probation, and it
relied on improper and unsupported factors to impose the upper term on count 1. The
People concede, and we agree, that the sentence on count 2 should be stayed under section
654. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
R.D. (the victim) and defendant dated from 2009 to 2015 and had two children
together. During their relationship,…