Elizabeth Lopez v. National City
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202220-56392California1,060 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JAN 28 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELIZABETH LOPEZ; JACQUELINE No. 20-56392
AREVALO,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:19-cv-00066-L-BGS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
NATIONAL CITY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
STATE FARM INSURANCE; DOES, 1-25,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 6, 2021** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge LEE
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Elizabeth Lopez and Jacqueline Arevalo appeal from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of National City and City Inspector
Luis Sainz. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367, and 1291. We
review the district court’s order granting…