Elizabeth Lopez v. National City

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202220-56392California1,060 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JAN 28 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH LOPEZ; JACQUELINE No. 20-56392

AREVALO,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:19-cv-00066-L-BGS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NATIONAL CITY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

STATE FARM INSURANCE; DOES, 1-25,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 6, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge LEE

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Elizabeth Lopez and Jacqueline Arevalo appeal from the district court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of National City and City Inspector

Luis Sainz. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367, and 1291. We

review the district court’s order granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.