Aims
Aims v. Usdea
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 202221-70544California6,634 words
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADVANCED INTEGRATIVE MEDICAL No. 21-70544
SCIENCE INSTITUTE, PLLC; SUNIL
AGGARWAL, Doctor, MD, PhD,
FAAPMR; ERINN BALDESCHWILER; OPINION
MICHAL BLOOM,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; D. CHRISTOPHER EVANS, in his official capacity as acting Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; U.S.
DRUG ENFORCEMENT
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Drug Enforcement Agency
Argued and Submitted September 2, 2021 Pasadena, California
Filed January 31, 2022 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Mark J. Bennett, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
SUMMARY*
Drug Enforcement Agency
The panel dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a petition for review of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”)’s letter sent in response to an attorney’s letter seeking advice and guidance on how a physician could administer psilocybin to a terminally ill patient without incurring liability under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”).