Aims

Aims v. Usdea

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 202221-70544California6,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADVANCED INTEGRATIVE MEDICAL No. 21-70544

SCIENCE INSTITUTE, PLLC; SUNIL

AGGARWAL, Doctor, MD, PhD,

FAAPMR; ERINN BALDESCHWILER; OPINION

MICHAL BLOOM,

Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; D. CHRISTOPHER EVANS, in his official capacity as acting Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; U.S.

DRUG ENFORCEMENT

ADMINISTRATION,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Drug Enforcement Agency

Argued and Submitted September 2, 2021 Pasadena, California

Filed January 31, 2022 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Mark J. Bennett, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

SUMMARY*

Drug Enforcement Agency

The panel dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a petition for review of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”)’s letter sent in response to an attorney’s letter seeking advice and guidance on how a physician could administer psilocybin to a terminally ill patient without incurring liability under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”).

Specifically, the attorney’s letter asked the DEA how the CSA would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.