Tomar

Tomar v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2022A161971California4,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/31/22 Tomar v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

SAKSHI TOMAR et al.,

A161971

Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-19-576120)

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Defendant and Respondent.

After Sakshi Tomar was struck by a car while crossing a street in the City and County of San Francisco (City), she and her husband (Plaintiffs) sued the City, claiming the intersection was a dangerous condition of public property (Gov. Code, § 835).1 The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, finding the intersection was not a dangerous condition as a matter of law. We affirm.

1 All undesignated section references are to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.