Chatman

People v. Chatman

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2022A151408ACalifornia3,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Background In an amended felony information, defendant was charged with, and subsequently convicted by a jury of, one count of violating section 530.5, subdivision (a) (unauthorized use of personal identifying information), four counts of violating section 530.5, subdivision (c)(2) (fraudulent possession of personal identifying information with a prior conviction), one count of violating section 530.5(e) (mail theft), and one count of violating section 459 (second degree commercial burglary). Defendant does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence to establish these offenses. She now disputes only the proper designation of one of the offenses in light of the statutory amendments made by Proposition 47. No evidence was introduced indicating

3 The Attorney General’s supplemental brief contends that Jimenez dictates affirmance of the convictions pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (c) of section 530.5 and asserts that defendant’s supplemental brief “acknowledges” that those convictions cannot be reduced, given the holding in Jimenez. While defendant’s supplemental brief is in fact silent about the convictions under section 530.5, subdivisions (a) and (c), she has not disputed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.