Andrews

Andrews v. Metropolitan Transit System

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2022D077550California3,639 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guerrero, J.

Filed 1/31/22

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TREASURE ANDREWS, D077550

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018- 00033322-CU-PA-CTL)

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Reversed. Huston | McCaffrey and Shawn P.K. Huston, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Liedle & Larson and Matthew J. Liedle, for Defendants and Respondents. Treasure Andrews sued the Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego Transit Corporation, and Janalee St. Clair (collectively, MTS) after she was injured on an MTS bus driven by St. Clair. MTS moved for summary judgment on the ground that Andrews’s complaint was barred by the statute of limitations because Andrews filed suit more than six months after MTS mailed a notice of rejection of Andrews’s claim for damages. (See Gov. Code,

§ 945.6, subd. (a)(1).) 1 Andrews opposed, arguing among other things that MTS’s notice of rejection was defective because it did not include the full warning required by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.